Prediction of Cem Ilkel [578th] vs Kris Van Wyk [381st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W L
Form
L L W W W L W W L LHead-2-Head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Wyk
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Wyk winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Wyk was at the Egypt F18, 11-05-2015, Second, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cem Ilkel | 1 |
| Kris Van Wyk | 0 |
| Ilkel | Stats | Wyk |
|---|---|---|
| 80% (24-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (6-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 578 | Ranking | 381 |
| 144 | Highest Rank | 352 |
| 29 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 4 |
| 57% (432-332) | Career Total W/L | 63% (194-115) |
| $225,530 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cem Ilkel vs Kris Van Wyk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Wyk
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 45.79% of points on their second serve, while Wyk has won 40.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 40.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wyk has won 48.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.8% and 26.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wyk has saved 53.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 58.18% of matches played (W/L 32/ 23), with Wyk winning 60% (W/L 54/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 282/ 176), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Wyk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 192/ 110), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.27% of matches (W/L 26/ 11), where as Wyk has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 38/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times and Wyk being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Wyk winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Wyk was at the Egypt F18, 11-05-2015, Second, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Wyk have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Wyk 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Wyk 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 180.6 while Wyk has played against players with an average rank of 130.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wyk has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 37.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wyk has converted 34.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Cem Ilkel vs Kris Van Wyk Best Odds For The Match
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matyas Fuele
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Thando Longwe-Smit
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mikal Statham
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
83%
(
43 of
52)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
7 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kris Van Wyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Kris Van Wyk
67%
(
72 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
10
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
45 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Faris Zakaryia
Player
Kris Van Wyk
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Matt Kuhar
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Viktor Jovic
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
6
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
5
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Kris Van Wyk
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Evgeny Philippov
55%
(
68 of
123)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
49%
(
27 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
48 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Aryan Lakshmanan
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
5
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Hugo Ouzilou
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
17 of
32)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Kris Van Wyk
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Kris Van Wyk
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Ilkel vs Wyk?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ilkel Vs Wyk is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (432/332) | Win/Loss | 63% (194/115) |
| 55% (965/800) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (416/281) |
| 52% (8656/8131) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (3499/2869) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 2802 | Aces Total | 1199 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1373 | Total Double Faults | 1128 |
| 1:14:33 | Average Match Time | 1:32:20 |
| 204.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 136.48 |
| 58% (23627/40473) | 1st Serve % | 60% (10122/17011) |
| 70% (16617/23627) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (7150/10122) |
| 51% (8584/16846) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3410/6889) |
| 40% (1602/3959) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (910/1979) |
| 39% (15947/40945) | Return Points Win % | 43% (7599/17614) |
| 56% (420/745) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (190/304) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (144/269) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (37/75) |
| 56% (127/228) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (52/84) |
| 85% (420/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (179/164) |
| 14% (420/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (179/15) |
| 21% (343/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (130/29) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Cem Ilkel
View full predicted draw for Ilkel
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
